Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You raise a very worthwhile topic, because both fields have expanded, and they have expanded along very different paths.

The medical field has splintered. Osteopaths kind of invented their own thing and broke into medical doctors' monopoly. Registered Nurses can do some things, but not others. BSNs. CNAs. Nurse Practitioners. Physicians Assistants. Chiropractors. etc. The strength of their cartel has led to attacks by new and novel qualifications, and the compelling need for more medical providers has allowed these attacks to successfully carve out roles.

Some can prescribe medications, others can't. Some are limited to specific medications. Others can perform surgery, others can't. Some can diagnose diseases, etc. Moreover, some qualifications are a step toward a higher qualification, others are traps that don't progress you to an MD/DO at all.

The legal field seems far more egalitarian in that any lawyer can practice any area of law (except patent law), and people can generally represent themselves and their minor children without any qualifications. Folk don't need a lawyer to contest tickets, or to draft contracts that they're a party to, or to negotiate their own settlements, etc.

However, appallingly, the general public is not allowed to prescribe medicine for themselves or their children. Folks cannot buy contacts / glasses on their own, etc. Folks shouldn't need a nurse to get antibiotics for ourselves, and yet we do.



> Folks cannot buy contacts / glasses on their own

That's news to me.


Yeah, in the US, customers need permission from an optometrist.

Edit: When buying for nearsightedness.


Some eyeglasses do not require permission (prescription) in the US, including bifocal and progressive lenses.


I know that's true for reading glasses, but is that also the case for distance?


I don't know: I've never needed a lens that "un-magnifies".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: