Your preferences are your prerogative. My point was in response to mvdtnz weighing in on something while being explicitly ignorant on the subject.
Its like going to a book club meeting, telling everyone that you obviously didn't read the book because you're not some unwashed heathen, and then proceeding to confidently give your analysis based on what you half heard someone on the train say about chapter 2.
To be very fair his youtube titles tell a lot about their content. To any persona with more than a handful of working neurons, that's more than enough.
Dude has lived so long without true consequences, getting second chance after second chance at the bbc before high tailing it to LA ... couple that with the probably epic amount of drugs and alcohol. My dude has cooked his brain.
So it looks like you actually have something behind your opinion. That's worthwhile.
> To be very fair his youtube titles tell a lot about their content. To any persona with more than a handful of working neurons, that's more than enough.
I can't agree with that. A handful of working neurons doesn't magically give you the ability to divine the contents of a book from its cover.
But it seems like you've at least watched some of his content and have your own opinion on it. I can respect that.
What I can't respect is when people happily form their opinions based on vague impressions gleaned from other people who also aren't familiar with the subject matter, and then pass that opinion on as if it's worth something.
Its like going to a book club meeting, telling everyone that you obviously didn't read the book because you're not some unwashed heathen, and then proceeding to confidently give your analysis based on what you half heard someone on the train say about chapter 2.