Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Indeed. If his videos are unacceptable, YT should have taken them down. If they're acceptable, then they should give him his money.


I would put forward that a less morally dubious way for YT to handle this would be to pull ads, and send the creator a pay-for-hosting agreement that they're required to sign if they want to keep the content online.


Then people would claim he’s being censored. It’s exhausting.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: