> In that sense trafficking victims are absolutely more deserving of those rights than convicted criminals.
No. you assume conviction = guilt, and that whatever treatment that comes thereafter is just.
For instance, it appears you would endorse treating people like these trafficking victims if they were first convicted by some court you consider valid, since "that's what being a prisoner means".
No. you assume conviction = guilt, and that whatever treatment that comes thereafter is just.
For instance, it appears you would endorse treating people like these trafficking victims if they were first convicted by some court you consider valid, since "that's what being a prisoner means".