I like fish. It's good to have on my machine. I can see myself using sometimes. I'm used to bash. Bash for scripting definitely. I'm not sure what makes me look more like a "hacker" using bash, or using fish?
I don't really care, but...ha! Just wondering.
I guess fish is like, you feel like you're living in the future, but also like "this is a past that should have already been available" then you find out it has been available, for 18 years, and you wonder, "Was it me that was living in the past?"
It's the kind of thing I'm scared to get burnt on, when it fails, because I already like it. I don't want it to disappoint me, because I just feel like: "new fangled, it's always gonna break." But then, it has been around for 18 years...so...hmm.
So, I don't know. It looks pretty! I like to use it. But bash is, feels, more stable.
Worth exploring! I'm not gonna config-it, as much as possible, but for interactive shell? I think it's good! :)
I don't really care, but...ha! Just wondering.
I guess fish is like, you feel like you're living in the future, but also like "this is a past that should have already been available" then you find out it has been available, for 18 years, and you wonder, "Was it me that was living in the past?"
It's the kind of thing I'm scared to get burnt on, when it fails, because I already like it. I don't want it to disappoint me, because I just feel like: "new fangled, it's always gonna break." But then, it has been around for 18 years...so...hmm.
So, I don't know. It looks pretty! I like to use it. But bash is, feels, more stable.
Worth exploring! I'm not gonna config-it, as much as possible, but for interactive shell? I think it's good! :)