Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"history's biggest non-nuclear explosion"

"Sixth-largest accidental artificial non-nuclear explosion in human history" according to [1]; other explosions listed in [2].

Hardly the main point of the article of course, but seems odd they got this so wrong.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Beirut_explosion#Yield

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_artificial_non-nuclear...



The wiki article has this line:

> Group at the University of Sheffield estimated that the explosion was one of the largest artificial non-nuclear explosions ever recorded

Presumably, they forgot the "ever recorded" part.


I don't now what exactly is intended with "recorded" in this context; the others seem "recorded" to me(?) I think it's more likely they read over or misinterpreted "one of the largest", or something like that.


Maybe a reference to climate alarmism?


You can arrive at any superlative (or first-ever) that you want, as long as you string up enough qualifiers in front of it.


I think they forgot the "one of" more.

Also forgot the artificial / man made bit. I guess the big bang would be the biggest non nuclear explosion in history?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: