Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Completely tangential to the article itself, TechCrunch's privacy controls are also extremely user hostile.

First it prompts you with the usual consent banner but of course doesn't provide a button to refuse all unless you click through to a second screen (this is in violation of the GDPR and ePrivacy guidelines btw, the "reject all" button needs to be front and center and must be given as much weight as an "accept all" button if present).

Then it shows me the article but the article embeds something (presumably a tweet or a Facebook post or something else) and tells me "To view this this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings. Click here to do so.". So instead of letting me decide in place that I want to agree to that one embed or even all embeds from the same source, I have to go somewhere else. And I don't even know what I'm missing out on and of course there's no direct link to whatever is being included either.

Finally if I click the link it takes me to a page with a big toggle switch that asks me to agree to all social advertising partners. Not just social networks either, most of these are just advertising and analytics. And I can't pick and choose either, I have to give a blanket consent without being informed of the details and purposes, which, again, blatantly violates the GDPR and ePrivacy guidelines.

I'm not pointing out that these are in violation because I think US companies should be beholden to EU law. I'm pointing this out because it demonstrates how blatantly user hostile this is.



> I'm not pointing out that these are in violation because I think US companies should be beholden to EU law

US companies doing business in the EU should be and are beholden to the EU law.


I didn't say I don't think that. I said that's not why I'm pointing it out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: