Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A claim like "improves reasoning by 70%" is too specific to be accompanied by neither a citation nor a definition.


My guess is that the author misunderstands this quote from the paper abstract:

>For instance, in Game of 24, while GPT-4 with chain-of-thought prompting only solved 4% of tasks, our method achieved a success rate of 74%.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: