The argument that there's nothing to worry about because other aspects of email communication is insecure is like saying that I shouldn't lock the door to my house since a house is fundamentally insecure, having windows that are easy to break.
My point is that, just because certain aspects of email communication is insecure doesn't mean we need to accept even more insecurity from our email provider.
The author also forgets to mention that the authorities have relatively easy access to people's email communications. Read http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/ to understand how troubling the American government's peaking into personal stuff is.
My point is that, just because certain aspects of email communication is insecure doesn't mean we need to accept even more insecurity from our email provider.
The author also forgets to mention that the authorities have relatively easy access to people's email communications. Read http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/ to understand how troubling the American government's peaking into personal stuff is.