Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He misremebered the third task as well, since his solution to it, as stated, is wrong. If you aren't given that every card has a number on one side and a color on the other, then you need to check everything which does not satisfy the consequent.


I added "We have cards with a number and color on each face." to the task statement. Hope this makes rules clearer as I could not phrase it better.


The rules were clear before, what has changed is that they are now different rules. You were just wrong before.

You've still got a problem though, now when you ask the reader to verify the rule, you have to explicitly state that they're not trying to verify the first rule.


Oh shit, you are right. Added a completely explicit statement under the problem question. In both situations.

Thank you for pointing this out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: