Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But compilers, chess, go and search are all proof that computers could think. We've been discovering as we scale up the hardware that those things appear to be converging to human intelligence with minor tweaks (turns out tree search for chess needed to be combined with matrices and we're most of the way there). ChatGPT can out-reason many people I know and can out-argue a fair number of comments I see on the internet.

If we took this comment at face value we're ending up with a definition of "think" that can't reason, play games or recall information - or it would be outdone by machines. Thinking obviously isn't very important!



> Thinking obviously isn't very important!

This is not obvious in the least. Thinking was required to produce the thing that could achieve the outcome that was defined by thought.

I could just as easily say that AI, as currently implemented, is really just another muscle.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: