Why not? Nobody put a gun to anybody's head and made them invest in META.
Arguably there's forced investment by index fund holders but now the SP500 eschews companies with that structure, so even index investors can avoid this sort of thing.
I'd argue that no single person should have that much power and wealth in this country. Why is it okay that Zuckerberg has absolute power over one of the most influential companies in the world? How does that benefit society as a whole?
> Why is it okay that Zuckerberg has absolute power over one of the most influential companies in the world?
Because that's the company he founded and owns. It wasn't one of the most influential companies in the world upon being founded, it became so with Zuck at the helm.
> How does that benefit society as a whole?
How does this have anything to do with anything? And how do you propose we measure it?
Arguably there's forced investment by index fund holders but now the SP500 eschews companies with that structure, so even index investors can avoid this sort of thing.