Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not weird. Either the driver is at fault, or the cyclist is at fault.


No!

This line of thinking must be severely confronted.

There's a third option. It is _your_ fault, meaning your commonwealth, your polis, your politicians, your city council, ...

The fact that so many cyclists and pedestrians get casually killed, is because roads are dangerous. They are only dangerous because of fast driving heavy cars. Slow down the cars, safely separate cars from cyclists with bollards, and this stuff ceases to happen so frequently.

In other words, our built environment needs to create virtuous conditions, rather than vicious ones.

We demand a virtuous environment from our factory floors, our theme parks, children playgrounds, ... but somehow, unfathomably, our public realm must be a Thunderdome, where death and injury is fully a personal responsibility.


A elite cyclist was struck head on while riding in a bike lane.

It's weird to automatically assume the cyclist was riding in the bike lane on the wrong side of the road.

Additionally, it was explained what happened in the very next paragraph, so maybe RTFA before commenting?


I can’t RTFA it’s pay walled. My reply that you ignored says that. It’s also against HN guidelines to comment about reading articles.


My reply that you ignored says that.

You aren't famous. I don't keep track of what you say elsewhere in a thread.

Regardless, it's absurd to not read an article and then make weird, victim-blaming assumptions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: