Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, I think they'll recover a large percentage of it, and that the difference won't matter.


I don't think "being made whole" means what you think it means.


The FDIC will cover the portion that they couldn't recover from bank assets. The depositors will be made whole (up to $250k), but it may take some taxpayer money to do that.


The subject of OP's post is the non-insured deposits.

No one, yet, has expressed doubt on the credit of the FDIC.

Sub 10% of SVB's deposits were insured. Meanwhile SVB's HTM bonds have taken a 20%+ loss which will, barring an acquisition, cause non-insured deposits to take a 19%+ haircut.

Combined with an indeterminate period of waiting. So start ups with cash in SVB should expect to lose 20% and find alternative sources to make payroll, pay payroll taxes, and pay suppliers. I expect we will see many startups close us shop when founders are unwilling to bail out their own company's balance sheet with personal money.


Ah, my bad.

Then yes, I agree they probably won't be made whole by the fed or government. Nor should they, in my opinion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: