> Food is parceled out so a small amount of food bank fraud creates a slightly smaller parcel for everyone, in the case where food is limited.
This makes sense, thanks for actually writing an easy to follow explanation.
> If fraud rates are small, the cost to everyone is trivial; if fraud rates are zero, the costs get piled onto a few unfortunate souls who couldn't pass the test despite actually needing help.
This makes sense, thanks for actually writing an easy to follow explanation.
> If fraud rates are small, the cost to everyone is trivial; if fraud rates are zero, the costs get piled onto a few unfortunate souls who couldn't pass the test despite actually needing help.
Can you explain how the second follows the first?