> The era of Donald Trump seems to have strengthened the diversity bureaucracy’s belief that students’ feelings must be protected.
This article is very weird. I realise that The Economist isn't just journalism, but also editorials and that every article is very open about its slant. The constant use of the deragotory "bureaucracy" and "bureaucrat" plus the use of a pseudonym of the author indicates that whoever wrote this has an axe to grind and is afraid to publicly grind it. It's obvious what the author thinks: diversity is bullshit, white male professors should be able to speak without fear, too much money is being used to scare white male professors.
Don't get me wrong, though. Unlike B. S., I am not telling you what to think. I am just remarking how odd it is to see such a slanted article.
[...]
> The era of Donald Trump seems to have strengthened the diversity bureaucracy’s belief that students’ feelings must be protected.
This article is very weird. I realise that The Economist isn't just journalism, but also editorials and that every article is very open about its slant. The constant use of the deragotory "bureaucracy" and "bureaucrat" plus the use of a pseudonym of the author indicates that whoever wrote this has an axe to grind and is afraid to publicly grind it. It's obvious what the author thinks: diversity is bullshit, white male professors should be able to speak without fear, too much money is being used to scare white male professors.
Don't get me wrong, though. Unlike B. S., I am not telling you what to think. I am just remarking how odd it is to see such a slanted article.