Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It keeps copies on each machine independently, if you change the default behavior to keep those copies, to be clear.

And Syncthing repeatedly and very explicitly warns that it is not a backup system, and you should have a separate backup running as well.



I've never seen these warnings, and I just checked their homepage:

"Run it on your desktop computers and synchronize them with your server for backup."


I could swear it used to be more prominent, but: https://docs.syncthing.net/users/faq.html?highlight=backup#i...


Yeah, I agree with this. For the lay person it's not going to work for backup, you need something else to checkpoint the files. Versions, ZFS snapshots (what I do), git, bash scripts + Backblaze, whatever. Lots of people don't want to mess with this, which is what Dropbox used to solve for. Now you're constantly barraged with whatever new methods they are experimenting with to monetize. But we know that, so I regress.

For those who don't mind a little extra work (I argue Backblaze is almost no work using their Web UI), syncthing is a really great solution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: