PF4 was already considered the culprit for a while, but formerly it was thought that negatively loaded DNA activated it.
Incorrect administration is still a risk, but not systemic / wide enough for the clotting cases I guess. And, you'd (1) expect cases to go down over time and (2) see them in mRNA vaccines as well.
So, no, PF4's been consensus for a while, this study gives a probable theory on why PF4 gets activated.
Incorrect administration is still a risk, but not systemic / wide enough for the clotting cases I guess. And, you'd (1) expect cases to go down over time and (2) see them in mRNA vaccines as well.
So, no, PF4's been consensus for a while, this study gives a probable theory on why PF4 gets activated.