Yes and no: OCaml supports exceptions, uses them extensively in the standard library, and most guides encourage people to use them for exceptional cases (i.e. where an error is not an expected use case and the caller probably will just propagate the error rather than try to "handle" it... which I would assert is true for almost all error conditions: you should essentially never "handle" errors or "catch" exceptions), so it doesn't really need such syntax... and yet (apparently? I am not an OCaml developer, having only used it enough to demonstrate it for a class I taught a while back) it was finally introduced in a recent version ;P.
