Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I like the work that Gov UK do in terms of accessibility, changes they make, and how they explain it. Not just from a compliance point of view, but a lot of thought goes into their design too. The first time I had to file my taxes (HMRC site), I was terrified, but their site guided me through the process, with clear divisions, sections, guidance along the way. In all of this their design decisions really shines, and it makes a lot of sense; dealing with legalese and paperwork is daunting, the last thing a user should be doing is having to 'navigate' your website.


Every time I use a gov.uk service I’m thoroughly impressed. The design is always clear and the UX simple. Kudos to the team.


Is there is one thing that the British government does really well, its presentation of public information.

Marvel at our road signage!

Travel across London with significantly fewer missteps than in other cities of equivalent complexity of metropolitan area transit networks!

Apply to change ownership of a vehicle!

...let me have this. We don't have much to be proud of from the last ten years.


British typography has a long tradition.

As a foreigner, I always found public signs very pleasant and easy to read.

Gill Sans, which has a really nice modernist aesthetics, was developed for London Underground: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gill_Sans


Shame about the dog-fucking but yeah Eric Gill was a genius at design.


You're gonna let the daughter-fucking slide but not the dog-fucking?..


What about running the fastest Covid vaccine rollout in Europe and helping Ukraine resist the invasion to preserve their sovereignty?


>Marvel at our road signage!

They're generally OK, but the fractions missing a bar, and using m as an abbreviation for miles are absolutely horrible.


Even the content is fantastic. They work hard to make it easy to understand.


Have a look at the Home Office part of gov.uk and I think you'll soon change your mind. Pure abomination. At one point, before I kicked up a fuss, they had 2 distinct links - Biometric Residence Permit (BRP) and Biometric Residence Card (BRC) - with apparently different destinations but which, in fact, pointed to the same form. Worse, staff responding to BRP/BRC enquiries were convinced the links pointed to distinct forms and were even including the fictional link distinction in rationales for rejecting applications.

Then there was the form with fields which rejected input with trailing whitespace with no explanation, ie. no trim function. I could go on.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: