Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This would benefit sequential access, but it'd either be disabled for random-access or pollute the caches with unused lines.

But in cases where sequential memory bandwidth is required, this is pretty cool! (But I assume Intel only, which would also be a bummer)



RAM is the new tape...


Somewhat ironic that we just reduced RAM channels from 64b down to 32b wide in DDR5 (but each DIMM has two channels). (newsflash if you missed it: desktop DDR5 is quad channel, but 32b, yes.)

SK Hynix: what if we increase the ram width to 64?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: