Giving people 17 days to exchange all their cash under penalty of losing all of it is weird, suspicious and stupid. And evil or incompetent or both.
People responsible for that are responsible for massive amount of human tragedy without a good justification (no, good intentions do not count as one).
> Please be specific, not just parroting something off a news article you’ve read
Can you explain how/why this demonetisation would NOT be “weird” or “suspicious“?
Incompetent? Most likely. Again I don’t see any convincing argument for why it’s “weird” or “suspicious” in the usual meaning of those words in the English dictionary. It’s fine to throw out a word salad if that’s your communication style, but don’t be surprised if people ask for specific reasoning for those words.
> Can you explain how/why this demonetisation would NOT be “weird” or “suspicious“?
> If you demand from me to spend time on more detailed explanation and you are unwilling to do the same, then I prefer to spend time on something else.
So you got nothing. I suspected as much, thanks for confirming.
Lets go with simpler one.
Giving people 17 days to exchange all their cash under penalty of losing all of it is weird, suspicious and stupid. And evil or incompetent or both.
People responsible for that are responsible for massive amount of human tragedy without a good justification (no, good intentions do not count as one).
> Please be specific, not just parroting something off a news article you’ve read
Can you explain how/why this demonetisation would NOT be “weird” or “suspicious“?