Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Niemann, as black, equalized reasonably early on and then had a consistent lead against Magnus the entire game. Magnus did make mistakes in the game, but only after a near-perfect grind for 27 moves.

Of course he played near-perfectly for 27 moves. That's what it means to be a 2700 (or even a 2500, if you think his recent ratings growth is the product of cheating). Virtually any high-level game will look like that - the players playing mostly perfectly, with on average one or two significant mistakes, but sometimes not even that.



Can we get concrete statistics on that? What does an actual 2700 game look like in terms of perfect move percentage? What about Hans?


What I read was that Hans' average centipawn loss in that game looked completely normal, for him or for any GM at that level.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: