Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, "PM10 for non-exhaust sources per km" and then the following line has more info about about pm2.5. Please just go read the thing it's not our duty to quote it at you piece by piece to disprove your assumptions about how good EVs are especially when the article is right there and not even long or very technical.

If you have trouble reading or understanding english then I apologize and of course please continue to get the information this way if that is best for you. I mean this seriously and not as an insult. I had a TBI once and had a hard time parsing information like this for a couple years after.



You should be less snarky when you're wrong. Non-exhaust sources also include tires and roads.


Go back and actually read your parent comment and then tell us who (still) really has the reading comprehension problem…


They weren't saying that. They were just saying go read it for yourself and decide.


Well I have autism and brain damage what's their excuse?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: