I think that is something to write our congressman about (or equivalent if not in US). Right now not only are patents written for lawyers, but the law encourages you not to look at patents since if you don't know about something relevant and you reinvent it you owe less damages than if you knew and still chose to infringe.
For patents to be useful they need to be writing in the language of experts in the field -not lawyers. And the law needs to make it best for my employer to make me search for and read potentially relevant patents before doing anything. That is infringing after making an effort to avoid a patent (that the courts decide is not enough effort) is better than infringing without knowing.
For patents to be useful they need to be writing in the language of experts in the field -not lawyers. And the law needs to make it best for my employer to make me search for and read potentially relevant patents before doing anything. That is infringing after making an effort to avoid a patent (that the courts decide is not enough effort) is better than infringing without knowing.