> It doesn't sound like you have any direct experience of this
It doesn't matter if I have personal experience with this although I do. A very bad personal experience with the mental health service that was provided as well as the side effects I was talking about.
> I had to come off them and it wasn't a problem.
This just comes off as ignorant, there is established literature on the withdrawal effects. I was not speculating or spreading FUD. They are real, documented and more common than your anecdotal lucky experience
So your bad experience is data, my ok experience is anecdote and is worth less than yours. Gotcha.
'I had no problem' means that bad problems aren't inevitable, which opposed the totally unqualified 'SEVERE' claim - they aren't always 'SEVERE'. That doesn't discount anyone's experiences when things do go bad as I acknowledged here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32169654 - I'm not dissing anyone's experiences.
You keep missing the point, there's a reason every doctor who prescribes these drugs will also make sure to taper you off because if you suddenly come off them there will be consequences. Now I'm not gonna troll the literature to figure out what the exact numbers are.
It's not about you dissing anyone's experience, it is about you ignoring the reality of this issue just because you were lucky.
Yes, they taper you off. This is to prevent the reactions being potentially SEVERE. In some cases they will still be SEVERE (yours), in other cases they won't (mine). I don't dispute that and I never did.
