Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't see how nuclear is any more dangerous than any other renewable sources of electricity. The law of conversation of energy dictates that the residual waste energy has to go somewhere for any process. Any and all energy production mechanism are going to cause some disturbance in the natural order of things. It just turns out that the emissions due to "renewable" sources isn't something that does widespread ecological or societal damage. A hydroelectricity plant's "emissions" are in the form of riverbed erosion however, we can optimize around that by putting it in places which minimizes ecological and societal damage. For nuclear, we minimize this damage by placing the waste matter in large indestructible concrete bins.


Maybe because of the potential toxicity of the waste product, and the lifetime of this toxicity?

storing it safely is a bit more complex than "large indestructible concrete bins"

nb. I'm not anti-nuke, just pro good risk analysis




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: