Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Nah, it's social constructs all the way down. A location might have gorgeous views, but if it's in a rural area and urbanization intensifies (think pre-pandemic), it will left in the dust as jobs and businesses dry up. Same goes if it's in downtown and it gets hollowed out (eg. white flight).


Do animals have social constructs? Because they have dens and territory that they use to survive as well. Property is a pretty universal value.


> they have dens and territory that they use to survive as well

A bear's den isn't its property any more than a park bench slept on becomes the slumberer's own.

Property, specifically, the system that relates a person to some land via a bundle of use rights, is a deep human construct. It likely goes back to the dawn of agriculture and civilization [1].

[1] https://books.google.com/books?id=f_roIy7ceEsC


> A bear's den isn't its property any more than a park bench slept on becomes the slumberer's own.

A bear, however, will use (and indeed seek to monopolize) violence to defend its den. That makes it property, at least until the bear relinquishes its claim (or something - or someone - else challenges its monopoly on violence).


> bear, however, will use (and indeed seek to monopolize) violence to defend its den. That makes it property

That makes it territory. The simplest definition of property might be use rights one doesn’t need to use violence to defend. (Countries don’t have property.)


> The simplest definition of property might be use rights one doesn’t need to use violence to defend.

For something to be property entails all of:

- usus: the right to use it;

- fructus: the right to profit or otherwise benefit from it; and

- abusus: the right to destroy it, alter it, or otherwise exclude others from it

Abusus is in and of itself violence (specifically, theft) unless consented to by all other members of society. By "use rights" you might be thinking of something like usufruct, which is distinct from property and (as you correctly assess) does not necessarily entail violence or the monopolization thereof.

> Countries don’t have property.

Of course they do: their sovereign territory. It is indeed that property, enforced via a country's / nation-state's monopoly on violence - from which all land ownership derives (hence: that piece of paper called a "deed" that would be useful only as kindling or sanitary napkins if not for the state enforcing it).


A bear's den isn't it's property, it's somewhere the bear lives. If a den were a bear's property, the bear would have paperwork.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: