Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd rather get things done in Go (or Rust). Better standard library, sane package management, dumb easy concurrency & parallelism, easy to distribute, compiles to a binary.


You spend far more time porting python libraries to rust when you can just use python for the vast majority of use cases.


is there a numpy for go? because numpy style numerics is table stakes for anything that replaces python.



I already knew about gonum. That's not numpy for go. Have you tried it? It's not really a replacement for numpy. And the API looks liek they barfed a bunch of line noise into the top-level namespace. By the time I've typed in the code in https://www.gonum.org/post/intro_to_stats_with_gonum/, numpy already computed the mean.

Not a compelling repalcement. I spoke to the gonum developers when they first created it and told them they were wasting their time beceause the go leaders made their language intentionally be a "systems language", not a "scientific language".


Go is painfully verbose and Rust painfully complex compared to python.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: