166% collateral doesn't seem so safe in a market where swings of 20%+ are not uncommon and 50%+ are not unheard of. Plus the value of many cryptocurrencies seem to be correlated and they will shed value together in a bad market. I think the thing that would give me the most confidence is the large portion of USDC collateral - but why not just use USDC then?
> 166% collateral doesn't seem so safe in a market where swings of 20%+ are not uncommon and 50%+ are not unheard of
If vault gets below the $1 + X%, then it is automatically auctioned. You can imagine quickly being able to switch the collateral backing to USDC by voting to raise the X for ETH while vaults are being liquidated in auction.
basically, if ETH falls like this, demand for Dai will skyrocket due to the auctions, and the only collateralization left will be the stable collateral.
The people most likely to be screwed are vault holders whose collateral is auctioned at a discount to boost the price of Dai, but the Dai will remain stable.
> why not just use USDC then?
Because being diversified is good and USDC is entirely centralized.
