Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Given the house for rent is an investment, it’s obvious who should be taking the loss: the investor.

That seems like a statement that feels good, but what should be the desired outcome for the benefit of society?

If you make taking a loss being the norm for a landlord, the outcome won't be having landlords grin and bear it and a city full of happy renters.

No, the outcome will be landlords will stop renting out since it doesn't make sense to take a loss. So the availability of rental units will dry up.



They will keep their properties empty - and thus only making loss - instead of renting and thus having some (low) risk of making a loss?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: