Which of the thirty references in that article do you feel are "cherry picking"?
What is your justification for dismissing data because it is "decades old"?
...particularly given that in the US, especially by the federal government, claims of "80%" helmet efficacy are based on one study of ER patients done in the early eighties?
What is your justification for dismissing data because it is "decades old"?
...particularly given that in the US, especially by the federal government, claims of "80%" helmet efficacy are based on one study of ER patients done in the early eighties?