Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No mention of this? https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

> You probably build websites and think your shit is special. You think your 13 megabyte parallax-ative home page is going to get you some fucking Awwward banner you can glue to the top corner of your site. You think your 40-pound jQuery file and 83 polyfills give IE7 a boner because it finally has box-shadow. Wrong, motherfucker.

> I'm not actually saying your shitty site should look like this. What I'm saying is that all the problems we have with websites are ones we create ourselves. Websites aren't broken by default, they are functional, high-performing, and accessible. You break them. You son-of-a-bitch.



This is so, so unhelpful.


I think it can be phrased more nicely (without satire), but the general message seems to be useful to novice web designers: to avoid overcomplicating things, to pay attention to accessibility, avoid breaking it too badly. Especially since many books/websites/guides will describe fashionable techniques without paying attention to that.

I'd also suggest reading Principles of Design [0] and other Design Issues [1] by TimBL, WCAG [2].

[0] https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Principles.html

[1] https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Overview.html

[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/


What’s wrong with it? I like KISS.

Is this better?

www.evenbettermotherfucking.website


For the sake of the trilogy: https://thebestmotherfucking.website/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: