No they weren't. They literally asked what the mission was. I replied with the primary source. Asked and answered.
>and neither that article or your explanation of it added more depth than the Twitter thread alone did.
Yes they did. It literally outlined the mission and the scope. It provided everything required to answer the GP's question.
No they weren't. They literally asked what the mission was. I replied with the primary source. Asked and answered.
>and neither that article or your explanation of it added more depth than the Twitter thread alone did.
Yes they did. It literally outlined the mission and the scope. It provided everything required to answer the GP's question.