>According to a very recent analysis by Ki Young Ju, a market analyst, a whale has bought $1.6 billion worth BTC via market orders in just five minutes.
This is interesting as it implies 1.6B of fiat moved hands (unless it came from other tokens which I doubt), very hard to pull that off while avoiding KYC.
I remark this as usually the 'whale' term implies some sort of anonymity as in "we only know a lot of tokens moved".
Whale just means rich person who can make a big splash in the market, not that they are anonymous and avoiding KYC.
Just because the general public doesn't know who it is, doesn't mean the exchanges used and regulatory agencies don't know who it is. KYC doesn't mean we the people get to know, just that government authorities get to know.
>I remark this as usually the 'whale' term implies some sort of anonymity
Does it ? Whale is commonly used in finance-related and casino-related subjects, where anonymity is nowhere to be found; and even in crypto anonymity is nowhere to be found, as yourself remarked, KYC is always needed as soon as you want to move crypto in/out of cash. The only anonymous part is that the common public doesn't know who that is.
Probably the Tether execs doing the old pump and dump to cash in before they face the subpoenas and the downward spiral of criminal reckoning...
I doubt anything was 'bought,' probably more likely 'traded.'
at this point, i dont know what buying means with all these other corrupt currencies. this could just be the proceeds from another successful pump and dump
This is interesting as it implies 1.6B of fiat moved hands (unless it came from other tokens which I doubt), very hard to pull that off while avoiding KYC.
I remark this as usually the 'whale' term implies some sort of anonymity as in "we only know a lot of tokens moved".