I am physically able, yes, but I am not legally allowed to. Since I am not given any permission (i.e. license) to do that.
> And the source is open, so you can check it out.
The term “open source” is used in two ways: the intelligence community reportedly uses it to refer to information sources which are publicly available, as opposed to secretly gathered information. The other use of the term “open source” is as defined by the OSI, who pioneered this new use.
The usual term for source code which is merely available for reading, and not much, if anything, else, is “source-available”¹.
We agree, then :) If they’re anxious regarding the privacy implications of using this extension, they can build it themselves.
> The term …
Alright, I agree, that was a misuse of the definition on my part, and I should have said “Source-available”. I was unaware of this definition, so thanks!
