Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The ethics I'm disputing are those of not grandfathering in those folks that have made financial decisions based on existing tax law. I would have made very different calls (quite likely more beneficial to my situation) had I not been relying on QSBS. I have no problems paying taxes in general, as one would with RSUs, for example.


I don't see the ethics in defending, but you're closing the loophole I intended to use. Pushed to the extreme, I bet slave holders were like, well I wouldn't have bought that slave yesterday if I knew you were going to free them today!


That's a hell of a stretch there. Anything in the tax code can be a loophole if viewed from the right angle. I don't see anything unethical in taking advantage of a LAW that trades early risk-taking for some later tax break, for the benefit of small business creation. Anyways, we're getting dangerously close to Godwin's law territory here, so I'm bowing out of this thread.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: