Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Nevertheless the calculation of the article is complete bullshit. You can not claim "not using fossil fuels would save billions of lives" when you need fossil fuels to keep billions of people alive in the present moment. It just doesn't make sense.


Both of those statements can be true. That was the entire point I was trying to make. It's not bullshit. Both of those statements are true.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: