Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's hilarious to me that someone thinks this is about controlling thought and not a defensive legal maneuver.


It's also absurd to me how the answer to "how can folks with whom I generally respect have reached such a significant gap in thinking?" is basically "they must be brainwashed by their Communicating Safely training"... That's such terrible way of dismissing someone who has a different opinion than you.


You just dismissed them yourself didn't you? "thats a terrible way" is an emotional cast to disregard the logic in the argument. Its lawyer speak. HOW DARE YOU style rebuttal.

Or.. maybe you're just using english with its rhetorical richness? the quality of emphasis is not meant to imply actual dislike or distain? In which case.. why can't you ascribe the same motive of language style to the original author?


Totally. This whole thing is just wild to me.


I mean it can easily be both at the same time.


Right. This seems to be needlessly overcomplicating/obfuscating whats going on.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: