ooph. with web1.0, you were probably safe making the window fit 800x600, so you could know the max-width (before it existed), and manually do line breaks. otherwise, if the table cells wrapped the text, the illusion would break. the flow would totally suck for copying the text, but that's just a bonusjonus for the DRM crowd. hell, put each word as a new cell in the row, or using a monospace font (could you in web1.0?), and put each character in a cell. nobody would be foolish enough to copy that from your website. webscrapers be damned!
Slightly differingly, I see how the web has evolved but also become less usable. Early web was so straightforward as the HTML tags available were so basic. The advent of comprehensive animations and high-fidelity graphics (and explicit design for web) has resulted in hard-to-scan web pages that (IMO) require far more cognitive expenditure to interact with.
1. Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics: http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm
2. Franco Maria Boschetto's personal website[1]: http://www.fmboschetto.it/
3. Ripasso di matematica aka RIPMAT: http://www.ripmat.it/
[1]: hn discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22326339