Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting review.

I didn't find your "economic argument against child sexuality" convincing however. (I understand you are positing claims about societal beliefs as opposed to your own)

"... we’re unhappy when people reproduce and can’t afford their offspring. So we call people who mostly aren’t economically viable children, even when they’re physiologically and psychologically not..."

Being under 18 may be one indicator of financial viability - although many children are born into privilege, are beneficiaries of trust funds, are financially self-sufficient.

Living on welfare benefits (or perhaps even minimum wage?) is a much stronger indicator of financial viability, and yet we don't see wholesale sterilisation of the unemployed or even any organised public policy discouraging sex between employees of the fast food industry.

I suspect that (as usual) there are more complex factors behind "age of consent" legislation than rational economic principles.



although many children are born into privilege, are beneficiaries of trust funds

Many? MANY!?!

I'd like to meet your friends. I'm guessing they are the ones who gave you this impression. I, for one, would LOVE to finally get some kickbacks from the 'many' trust fund kids out there.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: