Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Prove of algorithms is possible as long as there's a known method of doing so in SMT. That means in practice, if someone has written a paper for formally proving an algorithm in SMT, you can mostly copy paste the proof.

zz is developed in parallel with a large project using zz and new syntax sugar features will surface slowly as they become practically useful.

That being said, it will never replace external formal verification with something like coq. They serve a different purpose.



What's the large project using ZZ? Or is it behind closed doors? This appears to be an entirely different ZZ programming language: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/80752/


it is https://devguard.io/ which is being rewritten from rust to ZZ in this branch https://github.com/devguardio/carrier/tree/zz


Very interesting.

Can you tell us a little more about the reasons of the rewrite from rust?


I'm not involved, but one obvious answer is: broader portability than Rust (this is explicitly called out in the ZZ article). Clearly devguard is targetting a broader set of devices than the limited set Rust currently targets (x86; arm, mips, riscv in tier 2, with various caveats for bare metal targets).


Thanks!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: