> If you're going to refute McConnell or even Peopleware, you've got to do a study.
What McConnell has published isn't empirical, or scientific; argument suffices to refute it.
That goes for DeMarco and Lister, too - Peopleware was a popular book, not an empirical study aiming at establishing scientific fact.
> If you're going to refute McConnell or even Peopleware, you've got to do a study.
What McConnell has published isn't empirical, or scientific; argument suffices to refute it.
That goes for DeMarco and Lister, too - Peopleware was a popular book, not an empirical study aiming at establishing scientific fact.