Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree. Let's start charging cars every time they use streets and highway based on their mass and space used.


How does that differ from state registrations and fuel taxes?


> How does that differ from state registrations and fuel taxes?

The taxes are too low.

> The report documents that the amount that road users pay through gas taxes now accounts for less than half of what’s spent to maintain and expand the road system. The resulting shortfall is made up from other sources of tax revenue at the state and local levels, generated by drivers and non-drivers alike. This subsidizing of car ownership costs the typical household about $1,100 per year—over and above the costs of gas taxes, tolls, and other user fees.

https://outline.com/6A63aM

I feel like this is the same story that repeats itself all over the place.

Another one is when our northern neighbors in Canada complain about the Chinese elite buying up homes AND keeping them vacant. They want higher taxes on empty homes and homes owned by Chinese nationals. I say such a scheme is racist. The real solution is to increase real estate and property taxes on EVERYONE so each unoccupied house is a net positive return for the community. Nobody likes this idea. They don't want to pay higher taxes themselves. They just want to charge people who aren't there and don't have a voice.

Another example, when I brought up the idea of taxing revenues instead of profits, people said that retail grocery stores would fail instantly because they run on very slim margins. If we said taxes apply on total revenue, anyone operating on razor thin margins would pretty much instantly go out of business. (I usually don't like to admit my ideas are horrible but this one was pretty bad in hindsight. However, the point is taxes on businesses are too low as a percentage of revenue. As an individual, I am also able to spend all the money I earn. I don't claim I should pay no income tax.)


Trucks are the ones damaging the roads. They could pay their fair share and you can enjoy increased prices on all the goods you use delivered by their service.


Which would be in line with the GP's argument of self-sustain systems and not passing any cost anywhere else:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18956248


Do you think those cover the cost of building and maintaining the roads? Do local/property/state/federal taxes not contribute to roads?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: