Rubbish. He's providing links to http://www.skepticalscience.com/, which in turn has links to peer reviewed papers. It's a direct invitation to engage in meaningful argument - the science actually says "X" and here's how they arrived at that conclusion.
That most of the people he's replying to are unable or unwilling to engage doesn't detract from what he's doing.
Linking to a blog written by scientifically ignorant proponetns of a religion who make inaccurate in dishonest links to random scientific papers is not making an argument.
Just like you are unwilling or unable to engage in debate here.
Er, the guy running it is a scientist. If you disagree, or want to engage in debate, by all means start doing so and stop blindly downvoting everything that you disagree with.
You are expressing your bigotry towards me. When I disagree, I actually disagree, and it is this disagreement that you are responding to. You can't downvote a response you disagree to (or at least hacker news doesn't let me) and I don't downvote anyway.
If I disagree, I disagree by writing a counter argument. You may not like it, it may not be persuasive, but I write it.
As to whether this guy is a "scientist" or not, I don't think it is relevant as your movement commonly mischaracterizes people according to their ideological purity.
EDIT: Now I understand why you accused me of blindly downvoting. Projection.
That most of the people he's replying to are unable or unwilling to engage doesn't detract from what he's doing.