It does make sense. These are all techniques for dealing with async events (I/O). Thread-per-client, cooperative multitasking / co-routines with co-routine-per-client, ... all the way to C10K-style thread-per-CPU callback hell.
As I said both can be used to solve the same problem, but since they are totally different and works very different, to me it makes no sense doing a comparison and expecting similar results, if comparision's were analyzing the same technique in different languages then this will be fare.
