> Pulling things out of context eh ;) It's unfortunate you're not aware of any production ready private blockchain solutions. Maybe keep that in mind before you start with your next discussion.
Correction: I am not aware of any production ready private blockchain that cannot be replaced by another technology not using blockchain.
> Woah your e-penis is indeed very long! I am impressed!
It seems you don't know how to talk here in HN. You started your thread saying "I've worked on private blockchain solutions for financial firms" then there are many of your comments where you are showing some level of experience. I am showing my level of experience in the business like you.
> You started your thread saying "I've worked on private blockchain solutions for financial firms"
Yes: I stated "I work in this field, this is what I see around me at companies that are doing private blockchains. I haven't heard these arguments around me before."
While your approach is: "Here is my resume, now I demand you to give me examples so I can prove my point."
> Correction: I am not aware of any production ready private blockchain that cannot be replaced by another technology not using blockchain.
Ah great! Since your argument is that they can all be replaced, can you name a private blockchain solution that IS running in production that can be replaced?
While you are at it:
> Digital contracts are recognized if you have a private contracts agreeing on recognizing them.
IANAL but AFAIK this is completely false. Do you have any examples of smart contracts running on blockchains being enforced in a court?
> While your approach is: "Here is my resume, now I demand you to give me examples so I can prove my point."
I already probed my point beyond what I said afterwards. You just need existing cryptography and don't need a blockchain to make secure agreements between parties.
> Ah great! Since your argument is that they can all be replaced, can you name a private blockchain solution that IS running in production that can be replaced?
I don't need to since I am arguing about the no sense of private blockchains.
> IANAL but AFAIK this is completely false. Do you have any examples of smart contracts running on blockchains being enforced in a court?
If the smart contract uses digital signatures they are enforced by the existing law.
Also, as you probably know, this field is very new and the law was not, in general, involved with this kind of technologies.
Correction: I am not aware of any production ready private blockchain that cannot be replaced by another technology not using blockchain.
> Woah your e-penis is indeed very long! I am impressed!
It seems you don't know how to talk here in HN. You started your thread saying "I've worked on private blockchain solutions for financial firms" then there are many of your comments where you are showing some level of experience. I am showing my level of experience in the business like you.