Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have issue with the "Blue/Red Ocean" concept. Google is supposedly a Blue Ocean idea. Really? Sure, their approach was novel but the search market was already saturated by Alta Vista, Lycos, Yahoo, etc. You could say the same about Facebook with the competition of Friendster and MySpace.

In both cases they took a new angle that let them expand well beyond the existing market, but the market did exist and was already developed. I would say that most "Blue Ocean" ideas seem to be more like "Red Ocean, with potential upside".



I think of it in terms of: do customers already know that they want/need it - alternativly phrased - does is it solve a current customer need/painpoint?

Taking that into account, google is indeed rather a red ocean idea. Whereas, the iPhone was a Blue Ocean product. The original iPhone was a bad phone to make calls with, it didn’t know MMS and no App Store. Many would prefer a Blackberry back then for serious stuff. But, is was magical enough to create a new market through its appeal.


Nobody else was doing AdWords


which was stolen from bill gross and goto.

google's innovation was a wayyy better mousetrap. i remember the first time using it in 1999, those 10 blue links were like a new, far superior version of the internet


overture?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: