On mobile now, but they clarified somewhere that forfeitification does not apply to this particular hack, after getting lot of heat.

That's right. You'd only be forfeiting the right to sue in the event that they get hacked again. Which to be fair is looking decently probable at this point.

Edit: I would like to know at this point, which got taken down faster after it was first reported on... This tweet, or the perfectly fine video interview of CISO Susan Mauldin with the Cazena CEO from 2016 before the breach? That one went down quickly after it was reported on by Hollywood LA News.

It's gotta be close. I believe that both were taken down in less than 24 hours.

Glad to hear that! Thanks for giving clarification.