Honestly I’m not sure it’s possible to make DRM illegal. On what grounds with that be constitutional? Artists have had rights to control how their work is performed in the US forever. How is this any different? Why would one form get protection and not the other?
I mean legally I don’t know if this counts as a free speech argument or not I just don’t see how such a long would end up passing muster.
I mean legally I don’t know if this counts as a free speech argument or not I just don’t see how such a long would end up passing muster.